The blood-soaked slopes of Pahalgam, where 26 civilians — mostly tourists — were massacred, have shaken India’s fragile sense of security in Kashmir.
It is the deadliest militant attack since 2019, and a brutal reminder that the valley’s peace remains razor-thin.
But unlike past attacks targeting soldiers, this time it was unarmed civilians — making it not just a strike on lives, but an assault on India’s national psyche.
What India Has Already Done
India’s response was swift and sweeping:
- Border Closure: India has shut the Wagah-Attari land crossing with Pakistan.
- Suspension of Water Treaty: India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, a crucial agreement controlling river flows into Pakistan.
- Expelling Diplomats: Pakistan’s military and defense attachés have been ordered to leave; India’s own High Commission in Islamabad is being downsized.
- Deporting Pakistani Nationals: All Pakistani citizens residing in India — even those with long-term visas — are being expelled. Over 200 in Hyderabad, 12 in Odisha, and others across the country have been given 48-hour notices.
- Visa Crackdown: All visa services for Pakistanis, including medical visas, have been suspended.
And most importantly, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh declared a “strong response” is coming — one that will target not just the attackers but also those who masterminded the assault.
What Are India’s Military Options?
Analysts say retaliation is inevitable — the only questions are how, when, and how hard:
- Cross-Border Shelling
The ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC) has been fraying. India could resume sniper and artillery fire at Pakistani military posts and militant launchpads. - Surgical Strikes
As in 2016 after the Uri attack, Indian special forces could cross the LoC and hit specific terror camps — a limited but politically powerful move. - Airstrikes or Missile Strikes
Like 2019’s Balakot airstrikes after Pulwama, India could use airpower or cruise missiles to strike deep inside Pakistan-administered territory — a riskier, escalatory option.
☢️ The Nuclear Shadow
Both India and Pakistan are nuclear-armed. That fact forces both sides to act with “calibrated caution.”
A pattern from past crises — like Israel-Iran skirmishes — shows: limited strikes, quick retaliation, and then search for de-escalation.
But the danger is always miscalculation: if either side misreads the other’s intentions, a wider war could erupt faster than anyone wants.
Analysts warn that the high civilian death toll and the pressure of public anger mean that Indian leaders may feel pushed to take bigger risks this time.
The Modi government faces twin pressures:
- Domestically: It must show strength to a furious Indian public.
- Internationally: It must avoid letting a limited strike escalate into uncontrollable conflict.
Military historians point out that after the Pulwama-Balakot episode, both countries showed they could engage in “controlled counter-retaliation” — striking, responding, but stopping short of full war.
This time, however, the stakes are even higher.
The Pahalgam massacre has shattered Kashmir’s tourist season, wounded India’s national pride, and reignited the India-Pakistan powder keg.
Deportations, visa suspensions, border closures, and diplomatic expulsions have already set the tone.
A military response seems inevitable — but the world will be holding its breath for what follows.
Discover more empowering stories and insightful content like this on YOUxTalks, your go-to destination for inspiration and knowledge.
Follow YOUxTalks on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/youxtalks
